 |
www.justiceforchandra.com Justice for Chandra Levy and missing women
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rd wrote: | Also there is a podcast link. I have not watched any podcasts that I can recall. If it's not a Youtube video I guess I couldn't be bothered. I looked up Podcast just now in Wikipedia. I see "streaming applications" and "podcasting services". That lingo doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies.
Looking at other search results, I see "audio files". Audio? Like MP3 files? They can't be bothered with making a video? I watch Youtube videos all the time, from webcam simple to production level such as music videos and everything in between. I would not care to listen to audio. I will quickly scan through transcripts though. I clicked on trailer for this podcast for a few seconds and bailed. Worthless. | I haven't checked out the podcast yet. I forgot about it actually; so I'm glad you mentioned it. (They're good when you're walking, or driving, or sitting on a bus--something like that).
| rd wrote: | | The screenshots of the crime report much appreciated, Nancy. All the actions looked quite timely and complete to me. The comments on the dogs results were as I would have wanted it reported. | It surprised me that there were two and that each went in different directions. I had never heard that.
I tried to find an address for the apartments "around the corner" that the 2nd dog tracked to; however, since the exact name isn't the same I'm not sure if I have the correct one. The "around the corner" description fits location-wise, but both a Google driving path and a Google walking path require a right turn which is the same direction the first dog took.
| rd wrote: | On the pictures. I sharpened the hood a bit and slightly enlarged to try to see what they're talking about. Posted in large images thread:
https://www.justiceforchandra.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=39808#39808
I take it the solid area on the right side of the hood is where it looks like something large and solid was dragged on the hood, and all the "scratch" marks if you will on each side. Also a lot on the front of the hood. | You're big image helps a lot. It looks to me like she fell over the side of the vehicle and then was drug down and off the front. I'm thinking the smaller marks are from her fingers trying to find something to grasp. (Terrifying to think about).
What do you think those brownish red marks are from? Is it a reflection of something? IIRC, Jenn's vehicle was only two years old so it wouldn't be rust.
| rd wrote: | | Regarding the pic of the trunk, would you agree they would have pictured as they found it when they opened it? Therefore nothing was in the trunk. There was some speculation / comments about various items that may have been in the trunk. | Yes, the briefcase was one of those things. I haven't heard or seen anything new on the trunk yet. If you have, please let me know where you came across it.
Maybe Mr. Kesse sold some pictures to Fox News and more will be released soon. I'm thinking a new special is in the works--one that just might be worth watching.
| rd wrote: | | Regarding Tuesday morning and the witness, I will say I find the concept of a 5'5 guy stuggling with 5'8 Jennifer for the steering wheel to be hard to imagine. They're driving out of Mosaic that way, they're driving down the road that way? What, Jennifer says, oh, okay, you can drive. That's just some bizarre stuff. | Bizarre, indeed. I think when they first started mentioning those witnesses (2, IIRC), the tip was so weak they couldn't even remember if it was the same day as Jennifer was reported missing. Nor did they know which way the vehicle turned once it got to the main road.
Anyway, it's hard to give that much credibility. It's just that it goes strongly with a morning abduction, and they do seem desperate to prove that.
I believe Fox has dug up the actual witness or witnesses, so I think we are going to hear from them. :/
| rd wrote: | Against that one witness, who was not in the crime report so was reported to police some time after, not impugning witness or intent, but against that believed to have been seen is that Jennifer's phone wasn't on Tuesday morning, she had no contact with her bf, and there was no trash indicating her presence.
I get that there were outfits laid out on the bed, and a damp towel, but radio silence and no indication people leave of doing just about anything is very hard to overcome.
One aspect is the cellphone. From what I've read the Kesses said they could always reach Jennifer. If Jennifer was in habit of turning her cell phone off when going to bed that would be something that would be remembered. Oh, we couldn't reach Jennifer after 10 because she turned her cell phone off every night. And we wouldn't hear how she used her cell phone for an alarm clock. Yet when she disappeared her cell phone was off at 10.
I vaguely recall cell phones I had before and after 2006. I don't recall brand but I recall it was brick like and I kept in a charger overnight. My recollection is I kept in on while in the charger.
I had a cell phone problem in 2006, maybe it quit working, whatever, and I went locally here in Jacksonville to get a new cell phone. It was a Motorola Razr clamshell phone which I just doublechecked had a USB charger. So the days (and nights) of dropping ny cell phone into a battery stand to charge were over.
What did Jennifer have? I don't know. But I don't think from my experience and everything said that it was normal for her to turn her cell phone off at night to charge, not to mention using it as an alarm clock.
So off at 10 and no one wants to deal with why. | Yep, off at 10:40 pm; but they probably now say that never happened either. So they don't have to deal with why.
I think Jennifer's cell phone was a Verizon, serial #039-02071456. (Travis' was a Nextel). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rd
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 9277 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My bad, Nancy, I thought that picture was of open trunk, but it's foot area of drivers seat. Thanks for straightening me out on that.
The brownish on trunk looks like rust, doesn't it? That was my first thought, but I knew it couldn't be. Look closer and you will see that those are reflections of tree limb leaves. Take a look at picture above the car hood, it's a street view image. You can see one of those types of trees there at corner of building right beyond the pool where her car was parked. At least a tree like that in the area.
Speaking of which, I scrolled through several pages looking for some images. I need your help and insight offline. Email is quicker, but PM's or in our discussion forum below. My email is ralph@ee.net
thanks Nancy.
P.S. I just archived all your images in Jennifer Kesse Archives/Nancy Images |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, here I sit wasting more time on this case, but I hope they find Jennifer someday. I really do.
Regarding the eyewitness--in the podcast, she says she remembers the day clearly because it was the day her husband's radiation treatments began and they were on their way to the hospital for an 8:30 am appointment. (This would have been easy for LE to confirm in 2006).
She says she noticed it was a 4-door vehicle. That would take some serious swerving for her to see, IMO.
It's pretty rehearsed. She's obviously been all over the internet. Oh, she and her daughter even share the Kesse sex-trafficking theory.
Here is a link directly to the witness portion of the podcast: Fox News Investigates: House of Broken Dreams, The Jennifer Kesse Story. This particular portion is only about 16-minutes long. The whole podcast is professionally done and easy to listen to. Very well organized. There are even good sound effects. LOL
https://omny.fm/shows/derby-city-betrayal/a-witness-speaks-s2-e5
Below is a screen capture from Google maps, showing the location:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is one of those little details that snuck up on me and bothered me until I noticed it. :)
The explanation could be as simple as a typo or me not understanding correctly.
Anyway, here it is. See what you think:
This is a snip from Page 24 (see page 27 of your thread for full pageview). Notice it says Jennifer's car had gone through the toll at 0616 going to work.
Would you agree that means 6:16 am?
That is much earlier than has ever been indicated before. If she only left Fort Lauderdale around 6 am, she couldn't have been at that particular toll on the East/West Expressway in Orlando at 6:16 am. (It's firmly a 3-hour plus drive according to Google).
The return time of 1816 or 6:16 pm at least corresponds to what we have always been told. Also, notice it's exactly 12 hours. Is that strange?
Could the toll booth record the time inaccurately? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rd
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 9277 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
12 hours exactly, yes. And consequently 18:16 just happens to be 6:16 PM. They're saying 6:16 AM but that has to be wrong and an erroneous police report restatement of the evening toll time, otherwise Jennifer drove from Ft. Lauderdale in the middle of the night, 3 am or so. And Kesse's / bf didn't say that at all.
That's a detail Drew / his investigator should be able to clarify, as they would have the original Florida state toll records given to OPD.
Of course they don't clarify / publish anything, and if they do they act like they didn't, or say it was wrong, or say it doesn't matter, so I guess it doesn't matter. per Kesses.
Yes, I might be growing a little cynical after all these years. I'm still disgruntled about the cell phone crap he pulled. My bad.
When I saw the picture above my first thought was, did she get a picture of the car driving erratically? And then I thought is that a staged picture of the car driving erratically? And then I saw Street View, and thought that's an interesting random scene.
I was inclined not to impugn a witness's report or intent, but all bets are off for an involved person in conspiracies to come up with this some years later and "remember" why it was that exact day.
I have spent some time posting in Chandra Levy case about witnesses "remembering" seeing something two or three years later on an exact date. In that case secretly coached by DC Police but the concept remains the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Markybug
Joined: 13 Jul 2018 Posts: 92 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well it’s strange isn’t it , a lot seemingly happening information wise this year but it’s all (mostly) old news?
As mentioned, i thought the detectives at the start of the case kept zero notes ? But we have all this information that has been there for years , the car been driven erratically, the marks on the bonnet and floor mat , foot print on pedal , chino etc.
Who knows what to think or believe now ?
What was the consensus if any on the poi height? As chino is not short and that would rule him out according to LE and the FBI ?
Regarding Chino , am i correct that he is one of the individuals who claimed jenn told him to lock up her apartment as she couldn’t wait ? Which her father says is a complete lie?
Apologies if this has been mentioned before , as said it’s hard to follow this case sometimes! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Markybug wrote: | Well it’s strange isn’t it , a lot seemingly happening information wise this year but it’s all (mostly) old news?
As mentioned, i thought the detectives at the start of the case kept zero notes ? But we have all this information that has been there for years , the car been driven erratically, the marks on the bonnet and floor mat , foot print on pedal , chino etc.
Who knows what to think or believe now ?
What was the consensus if any on the poi height? As chino is not short and that would rule him out according to LE and the FBI ?
Regarding Chino , am i correct that he is one of the individuals who claimed jenn told him to lock up her apartment as she couldn’t wait ? Which her father says is a complete lie?
Apologies if this has been mentioned before , as said it’s hard to follow this case sometimes! | Yes, you are correct in believing Chino is one of the two individuals who claimed Jenn told them to lock-up her condo. "Ben" is the other one.
I think the fact that he passed a poly--both of them did, IIRC--is the reason for LE backing off. I wouldn't go so far as to say LE ruled them out completely because they say no-one except Rob has been considered ruled out.
But LE can't just keep going after them without more evidence. It becomes harassment if they do.
Have you noticed he has been amusingly co-operative lately. He answers the door for reporters and he gave a lengthy interview to the reporter from Fox who did the podcast. (Although she chose not to reveal it for now). I think he has also talked to Kesse's PI or at least agreed to.
I really don't think it's him, but I find that the guy who parked Jenn's car is a smart-azz type guy like that.
So, if he keeps talking I guarantee he will slip and they will find what they need. We'll see.
What do you make of the dead dogs, and maintenance workers riding around in golf-carts openly smoking marijuana (in 2006) with keys to all the units; the hap-hazard security at the gates, if that; and the 10 workers living in the unit next door to Jenn's condo?
Did Jenn know all that while only complaining about the "workers" luridly watching her in the parking lot?
Let's not forget that Jenn was a woman who paid attention to who was walking behind her in a mall in broad daylight while she was shopping.
Yet she chose to live in a place like that?
I don't understand it. I don't believe it, really. It's simply ridiculous. If not racist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Markybug
Joined: 13 Jul 2018 Posts: 92 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chino “lying “ about locking up jenns apartment is a sticking point for me , can’t think why he would lie about this , or even bring it up!?
Everything about the complex ( if true) makes it seem a sketchy place to live , the dead dogs thing is disturbing to say the least. As you say why didn’t jenn mention these things and others to her family ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2020 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Markybug wrote: | Chino “lying “ about locking up jenns apartment is a sticking point for me , can’t think why he would lie about this , or even bring it up!?
Everything about the complex ( if true) makes it seem a sketchy place to live , the dead dogs thing is disturbing to say the least. As you say why didn’t jenn mention these things and others to her family ? | He probably brought it up because LE asked the question.
The last thing I want to do is defend this guy. I believe he has served time for sexual assault of a woman. That says everything I need to know.
However, think about this. Wasn't there a 2-year time-lapse from the time of Jennifer's disappearance to the time LE did the interview and lie detector test?
What if he couldn't remember the exact details of being in Jennifer's condo doing touch-up painting the week before she left for St. Croix? What if he did touch-up work for various condo owners several times a day, every day? After a while wouldn't they all blend together?
If he didn't harm Jennifer, what would make being in her condo stand out to him for 2-years?
So maybe he wasn't lying as much as he just didn't remember the circumstances. Maybe that's why he passed--because he was telling the truth as best he could remember it.
He had a full set of keys and could come and go, to and from, any condo he wanted to, whenever he wanted, apparently. He probably wasn't very concerned about Jennifer in any way that would have stuck in his memory.
While I don't think the motivation for Jennifer's disappearance originated from any ordinary worker directly employed to work at the Mosiac, I don't understand why Jennifer, of all people, bought a condo there.
When you buy a house, you check-out the neighborhood a little bit, right? Wouldn't you do the same with a condo?
I would especially expect that from Jennifer and her family. And Jennifer had never lived alone before. That was no place for Jennifer to live.
Buying elsewhere probably wouldn't have changed the outcome, but it might have meshed better with what they are asking us to believe. If that makes any sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rd
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 9277 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2020 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some interesting questions and comments, Marky and Nancy.
Since I'm down here in Florida with some similar history, I'll shed some personal insight. I sold my house and moved down here in early 2005 for work, which I'm still working at. Turns out that was an interesting time. I went around looking for an apartment and found that many apartment complexes I was interested in were no longer apartments, they were being converted to condos, just as the Mosaic was.
It turned out to be part of the real estate meltdown, part of the 2008 crash. It was a money grab. But Jennifer was happy, proud even, of making her first residence purchase in a nice, high profile area of the mall.
I got an apartment, which I still live in, in a similar complex, gated and typical layout and amenities. Is there any crime? Sure. We get a notice every once in awhile that there's been some car break ins or even very rarely an indication something missing from an apartment, that sort of stuff. The main road a few blocks away will have complaints about crime and homeless if you look for it.
But the Mosaic and even Huntington on the Green described as high crime areas just cracks me up. Has anyone ever seen a high crime area? It certainly doesn't look like the gentile suburbs of Orlando. Sure, we all need security, preferably gated, with patrols and surveillance cameras. There are basically people who steal for a living, and Florida attracts more than our share. But high crime? If that is high crime area, what do you call high crime areas? War zones? Okay, I'll concede that point.
Reminds me of work I did on the Chandra Levy case. I walked the streets in DC and around some of those intersections that are called high crime areas. Every time there's a crime people start talking about a high crime area. Chandra was said to live in a crime area on DuPont Circle. And you get details of these crimes and it's like petty stuff.
Yeah, in the past once in Columbus I had my car window smashed, stuff stolen, and my wallet found miles away thrown to the side of the road (which was better than losing it). It's an unpleasant experience, but high crime?
I'm quite sure any area like that is going to be called high crime area because there are people and a bunch of people are criminals. But outside of some small village or rural area where strangers are watched with suspicion, I'm at a loss at how anything is not a high crime area. But those quiet roads in Orlando in front of the Mosaic and Huntington on the Green and the downtown DC streets I walked, even very late at night, are most definitely not anything that could be called high crime.
Back to the conversion of Mosaic to condos, in my opinion illegals or people otherwise flying under the radar for work, have a lot to lose if they get in trouble. It's the people not willing to work that you want to keep an eye on. Plus when you have a crew working together, they know when someone is missing.
This isn't the Mafia of various nationalities we're talking about, or gangs of illegals, these are working people. And they lose their livelihood when one of their own brings law enforcement down on them. So this is the opposite of crime gangs.
To sum up, if the Mosaic was housing with a crime gang, that is a high crime area, and Jennifer wouldn't have been living there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with your overall summation and appreciate your insight.
| rd wrote: | | Respectfully Snipped By Me ... But Jennifer was happy, proud even, of making her first residence purchase in a nice, high profile area of the mall. ... |
But why would she pick the Mosiac? It was only one of many, many beautiful living areas in Orlando; and others are equally close to the mall.
So why would Jennifer--a highly intelligent, extremely safety-conscious individual--pick one that was under serious construction; with proper security not yet functioning? She must have realized the uncomfortable inconvenience that could cause. Nearby construction on its own can make anyone feel like they are living in a war zone. It's noisy and dusty. There are always "new" people coming and going.
And the renovation was just beginning at the Mosiac. It would have been easy to expect it to go on for years.
So why buy there when she could have bought a condo with all renovations completed and equally near the mall--with reliable working security that a little research should have been easy to confirm?
I'm sticking a little on this issue because I'm wondering if there is a tiny dangling thread in here somewhere.
Is there any chance that Jennifer's employer was somehow a hidden owner or part-owner of the Mosiac and was able to facilitate her mortgage? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rd
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 9277 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some good questions. She moved from Ocoee, where she worked, to a fair commute away for some reason. Condos, especially apartments being converted to condos, were everywhere at the time.
1 - I expect that first units of an apartment complex being converted to condos would have lower than market pricing to attract buyers in the midst of conversion construction. This also gives the complex owner selling statistics for prospective buyers, as in they're selling out already, etc. However, it was a very common situation at the time and not something you'd have to travel far to find.
2 - What was in the Millenia Mall area to choose that area to commute to work from? We saw some information about an ex-bf who she spent some time with at a bar / restaraunt in the nearby mall. No matter what the timing of the breakup with ex and taking up with the bf in south Florida, I would expect she was familiar with the mall area and perhaps liked it.
She possibly chose that location to buy while still dating or emotionally attached to the prior bf. And it turns out as I understand it from posts the night that communications ended that the ex was just a short distance away in that mall bar which to me makes the choice of the Mosaic to buy not that random.
3 - Jennifer may have wanted to get out of the Ocoee area to buy a home. Was there someone making her uncomfortable there and she felt safer close to where she hung out with bf / ex? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, this turned out to be a walk down memory lane. :)
What stood out quickly for me was Jenn seemed to like living in proximity to a favorite drinking establishment.
I have 6409 Raleigh St, Orlando, FL as an address for the Florida Tap Room, (home to the last known location of Tracy Ocasio) and I believe Jennifer lived at Amara At MetroWest Apts prior to moving to the Mosaic. I think she simply had to walk through a parking lot or something to get to the Tap Room--it was very close. (Both locations are near the Ocoee/Orlando boundary).
According to Google maps, it would take Jennifer about 7-minutes longer to drive to her workplace from the Mosaic.
The Tap Room, from my understanding, is a sports bar while the Blue Martini (where an ex was hanging out on the 23rd) was a tiki bar. She met Rob at a different tiki bar, and she had drinks with a female friend (possibly) on Wednesday before she left for St. Croix at yet another tiki bar.
So it may be safe to say that her tastes were changing in favor of tiki bars. And the Mosaic was within walking distance of a very popular one in 2005/2006.
Whether or not it's pertinent to her disappearance, it is interesting to note. I don't think I ever looked at it in this light before.
Another thing about the Mosaic location that possibly interested Jenn was its nearness to Windermere--a 20-minute drive. Coincidently, the big boss of Westgate, the same guy who twice put up the $1,000,000.00 reward for info leading to the return of an "alive" Jennifer, was building a big new pad there.
It's said Jennifer liked to get her groceries and drop-off her dry-cleaning in that area. A little strange, huh?
One more thing that is even stranger and, admittedly more towards rumor because of the source, is that the route to Windermere from Jenn's condo passes the Turkey Lake Road where a search was done for Jennifer and where it is said that an ex was involved in a timeshare. Well, well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rd
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 9277 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a post I made on Mosaic to Windermere:
There have been a few posts mentioning Jennifer often driving to Windermere, a keyfob that resombles hers found on a street there, etc. I've heard about it and the expensive homes, etc. but thought there'd be some substantial retail somewhere because, for example, mention of Jennifer going there often to take care of some things.
I decided to take a look at it on the map. I see you get there on Conroy the opposite direction of going to Huntington on the Green (west versus east). But I saw next to nothing on retail there, just a small Main St. village type thing.
I rechecked with satellite images and that's all there is. Maybe Windermere is a euphemism as in I drive toward Windermere and there's some retail on Conroy before I get there that I use, etc. I don't know. Of course there would be extensive retail and services surrounding the Millenia Mall so I don't get the Windermere thing.
There's a lot in what you mention about Windermere, Nancy. Goes further into why Mosaic was chosen. All of those choices of shopping are from experience there.
Is the very popular tiki bar within walking distance referring to the Blue Martini? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy
Joined: 11 Jul 2018 Posts: 460
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rd wrote: | | Respectfully snipped. Is the very popular tiki bar within walking distance referring to the Blue Martini? | Yes. It's not called the Blue Martini at the present time, though. Currently, it's Earls Kitchen & Bar.
I hope I'm not repeating myself here, but just to be clear, I'm discussing the location of a bar at the Mall At Millenia in 2006. Shown below as Location A, it is attached to the mall but has its own entrance/exit. I cut the screenshot off a little bit too soon. Sorry if this is confusing.
Google says it's about a 17-minute walk. On my map insert, #7 is in the vicinity of the broken fence; #3 is where Bo sat at the open-air stairway; #2 is Jenn's condo building, and #4 is Jenn's parking spot.
The green arrows and dots indicate how Jenn could have exited the front door of her condo building, followed the sidewalk along the pond, and slipped through the fence opening, shortening the walk time by quite a bit.
Google gives a driving time of about 5 minutes.
FYI: I had forgotten about the keyfob. That fits right in there nicely, doesn't it? Sometimes I get the feeling that someone tried to leave a trail but no one picked up on it.
Poor Jenn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|