www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index www.justiceforchandra.com
Justice for Chandra Levy and missing women
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FBI "Revisits" Lead in Chandra Levy Case:Maryland
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index -> Chandra Levy and missing women
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
blondie



Joined: 10 Oct 2003
Posts: 567

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember that too and its always puzzled me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jane



Joined: 22 Sep 2002
Posts: 3226

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is known that Condit would have been an important player (along with the other Blue Dogs) if not for Chandra's disappearance. Maybe that's the reason for so many White House visits?
_________________
"There is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known."
Christ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9274
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Correct. And he used that critical influence he had to obtain a last minute lunch hour meeting with Cheney the day Chandra disappeared. It is known he requested it, and it is known he lied about who requested it and why.

The question is, when did he ask for that meeting. It should be obvious why he asked for it.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
art



Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Location: michigan

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 8:21 pm    Post subject: freed/cheney/condit Reply with quote

perpietiea and blondie,
yes very puzzling and here lies the whole case.....somewhere there is something linking these three guys together? What is Freed doing now other than taking care of his many children...please!!!!! Is he working for Homeland Security...no they turned him down for the gay governor's friend. Does he do part time work for the Defense Department in some obscure office somewhere? Does he have friends like Dayton who are involved in Homeland Security...just thinking??????ART

Freed resigned on May 1st the day Chandra went missing...


It is interesting that Cheney's secretary first reported Condit had an appointment with Cheney on April 30th. Interestingly enough, Condit was there on the 3-th at the whitehouse?????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
art



Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Location: michigan

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes get picture of Sven Jones...he was on Good Morning America the first week Chandra went missing....I can't get it I tried can't seem to get the transcript of the show without paying some money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laskipper



Joined: 17 Sep 2002
Posts: 1232
Location: Northern Ohio

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I looked for a picture of Sven Jones but come up with nothing. I have a feeling all the information is long gone. Dead links.

As for Freeh, here's what he is doing:


http://www.innsofcourt.org/contentViewer.asp?breadCrumb=6,123,125,1272

Fair use

Excerpt:

Louis J. Freeh Named as Trustee of the American Inns of Court


7/13/2004 - 9/13/2004

Alexandria, Virginia (June 21, 2004) – Hon. Louis J. Freeh of MBNA America Bank, N.A. in Delaware has been selected for a second term as a Trustee of the American Inns of Court Foundation. He will serve a one-year term as a Public Trustee, beginning July 1, 2004.

Louis J. Freeh graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Rutgers College in 1971. He earned a J.D. degree from Rutgers Law School in 1974 and an LL.M. degree in criminal law from New York University Law School in 1984. He also served as a First Lieutenant in the United States Army Reserve, Judge Advocate General Corps.

Mr. Freeh served as an FBI Special Agent from 1975 to 1981 in the New York City Field Office and at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. In 1981, he joined the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York as an Assistant United States Attorney. Subsequently, he held positions there as Chief of the Organized Crime Unit, Deputy United States Attorney, and Associate United States Attorney. He has been recognized for his exemplary accomplishments, including landmark investigations and prosecutions relating to racketeering, drugs, organized crime, fraud and terrorism.

In 1990, he was appointed a Special Prosecutor by the Attorney General to oversee the investigation into the mail-bomb murders of Federal Judge Robert Vance of Birmingham, Alabama, and civil rights leader Robert Robinson of Savannah, Georgia. This case became known as the VANPAC case. After extensive investigation, a suspect was apprehended, prosecuted, and convicted.

In July 1991, former President George Bush appointed Freeh as United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York. While serving in this position he was nominated to be the Director of the FBI by President Clinton on July 20, 1993. He was confirmed by the Senate on August 6, 1993, and was sworn in as Director on September 1, 1993.

In his career as a civil servant, Freeh had been recognized on several occasions for his exemplary accomplishments. In 1987 and 1991, he received the Attorney General's Award for Distinguished Service, the second highest annual honor given by the Department of Justice. Other commendations include the John Marshall Award for Preparation of Litigation, awarded annually by the Attorney General, and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association Award.

Upon leaving public service in 2001, Mr. Freeh became the Senior Counsel for Law and Government Affairs and General Counsel for MBNA America Bank, N.A. in Wilmington, Delaware, where he oversees the bank’s legal and government affairs.
The American Inns of Court is a national legal association comprised of over 24,000 federal, state and local judges, lawyers, law professors and law students in some 350 chapters across the United States. The American Inns of Court is dedicated to promoting ethics, civility, and professionalism through mentoring and educational programs at the local level.

The American Inns of Court was the vision of Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, who was instrumental in founding the first American Inn in 1980. Today, the American Inns of Court continues to be one of the fastest growing legal organizations in the country.
end excerpt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
benn



Joined: 19 Sep 2002
Posts: 2136
Location: Sacramento, CA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

>>> The question is, when did he ask for that meeting. It should be obvious why he asked for it.<<<

I can't add anything to what you guys are looking for, only add a little more fuel to the fire.

I have been thinking, a little, and now may be a good time to write to some of the people whom maybe we have ignored before.

Dan Rather is in the midst of a lot of controversy, and now might be a good time to write to him and ask him questions about the Chandra Levy case. Think of all of the doors that Dan could open up if he wanted to. We could write to Dan.

Another person to write to, or phone, or however they communicate, is Maury on the Maury show. I see a little of his program often while waiting for the news to come on. Maybe it would be possible to get the Chandra Levy case brought up on the Maury show. It might just take a creative letter to do that, or a creative contact with the Maury show.

The other person whom I was thinking that we might contact is the FBI man in charge of the Chandra case at the present time. Now might be the time to write to him and ask a question or two, or possibly present a little of the investigation from our point of view. Maybe ask him if total secrecy on the part of law enforcement is the best way to solve the crime. I just looked up his name here, I think I have it right Special Agent Brad Garrett.

All right, I have made all of these suggestions for everyone else, now I will have to see if I can do any of the things that I have suggested myself. Maury, Dan Rather, or Brad Garrett, which one to contact first? :)

benn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laskipper



Joined: 17 Sep 2002
Posts: 1232
Location: Northern Ohio

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Benn, I would say Brad Garrett would know more than anyone else about Chandra's case but tell the least. He's known as the "Fixer".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
waveca



Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 14
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 11:47 am    Post subject: WHO TO CALL ? Reply with quote

John Walsh anyone ?????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
benn



Joined: 19 Sep 2002
Posts: 2136
Location: Sacramento, CA

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

laskipper wrote:
Benn, I would say Brad Garrett would know more than anyone else about Chandra's case but tell the least. He's known as the "Fixer".


What does "Fixer" mean?

skipper, maybe I can find the email that I received from Joseph D. McNamara who made some remarks about Police Secrecy in the Sniper Shootings on the East Coast.

I know none of those Washington people are going to listen to us. Well at least you gave me the idea. That might be a good subject to research, "police secrecy."

benn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laskipper



Joined: 17 Sep 2002
Posts: 1232
Location: Northern Ohio

PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Benn, Good luck to you in your quest. I'm glad I gave you an idea for research!

Brad Garrett became know as the "Fixer" due to the fact that he is called in to find someone to take the blame for various murders. I Googled to find some links for you.

http://www.etherzone.com/2001/fahe080601.shtml

Excerpt:

The first thing you should know about this gentleman is, that he was the prosecution's closing witness in the case against Mir Aimal Kasi, the Pakistani national who offed two CIA agents at an intersection in front of the Company's Langley headquarters, and was the FBI agent dispatched to Pakistan for the safe return of Kasi back to the United States, and who is also credited as receiving Kasi's confession of said crime. Involvement in such a case, at minimum, reveals Mr. Garrett's "sensitivity-training" to things related to National Security.

--The second thing you should know about this gentleman is, that he participated as a lead FBI investigator into the "suicide" of Clinton White House legal counsel Vince Foster. (An article from WorldNetDaily... "Foster's body was found July 20, 1993, at 5:50 p.m. near the northwest corner of Fort Marcy Park, Va., approximately 700 feet from the parking lot. The body was found in a heavily wooded area lying on one of the earthen berms of the Civil War fort. The official cause of death -- touted from the outset as a suicide -- was declared due to a gunshot fired into the mouth; the weapon, said to be a black 1913 Army Colt .38 Special six-shot revolver, was said to have been found in Foster's hand." It is significant, therefore, to note that x-rays of the initial autopsy of Vincent Foster's corpse are listed by Federal coroners as now being "missing"; and that no one in the Foster family recalls there being a firearm of that model or appearance anywhere, ever, in their residency; and that, also, there was no blood found on the forearm (cuff, sleeve, wrist) of Vincent Foster, such as would have been elicited naturally (they call it "blowback") by a self-inflicted gunshot held close inside the soft-palate.)

--The third thing you should know is, that Garrett served as lead FBI investigator into the case of Congressional intern Mary Caitlan Mahoney, who was murdered by gunshot at a Georgetown D.C.-area Starbucks coffeehouse, a triple-homicide which--according to an Intelligence source close to the FBI investigation of the Mahoney slaying, who wishes to remain anonymous--was "solved" by the same agent Brad Garrett after a suspect was kept awake for three days, his confession being forced under extreme duress. Not so curiously, perhaps, is Monica Lewinsky's statement to Vernon Jordan, in her first meeting with the powerful Clinton White House advisor, as saying, "I don't want to end up like Caity Mahoney" (source: Craig Karpel, publisher The Colby Intelligence Letter, 1/23/98).

end excerpt

I don't know anything about the first case in the above but Mary
Caitlan Mahoney and Vince Foster, I've read about.

Many believe that Mary Caitlan Mahoney was murdered by the same group (if it is a group) that was responsible for Chandra's murder. Garrett found a suspect who "confessed" to the murder (and that of her co-workers) after being kept awake for 3 days. Stress such as that could make almost anyone confess to almost anything.

Vince Foster is another long story. Google Vince Foster and Brad Garrett for an interesting look at Foster's suicide.

Here's another link or two:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=10815

http://www.strike-the-root.com/4/herman/herman1.html

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/MediumRare/26.htm


TOO MANY DOTS
By Jim Rarey
April 11, 2003


Looking at today’s news, this writer was struck by the reappearance of names of people who have been involved in cover-ups in the recent past. Like Yogi Berra’s aphorism, it’s “deja vu all over again.”

Perhaps the best way to illustrate this is with some snippets from this writer’s articles over the past two years.

One of the most intriguing is the background of FBI agent Bradley Garrett. He was involved in a murder case the authorities considered a “run of the mill” robbery/murder. The people involved in that case would lead one to think it was a high national security case.

From this author’s article, “CHANDRA, JOYCE AND MARY - R.I.P.” of September 16, 2001:

“The murder of Mary Caitrin Mahoney and trial of her alleged killer, while probably not tied to the OKC bombing nevertheless involves an almost unbelievable cast of characters at a time large amounts of illegal campaign finance money were being raised and serious breaches of national security occurred.

Mahoney had landed an internship working in the office of the Secretary of Commerce, Norman Mineta (the Current Transportation Secretary) for Doris Matsui. Matsui is the wife of California Democrat Representative Robert Matsui. However, she had political connections of her own having served as a trustee of the California Economic Advisory Council with Public Official Executive Board members, Gray Davis, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein.

Matsui worked closely with John Huang, with the title of deputy assistant to President Clinton. Together they raised over $3 million in campaign funds from Asia and Asian-Americans. $1.2 million had to be returned because it came from corporations and non-citizens.

It was in this time frame that John Huang worked first in the Commerce Department and then transferred to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) but kept his high security clearance. Huang had been attending CIA briefings and then immediately went across the street to the Washington office of Jackson Stephens, the Arkansas broker who was a financial angel of Bill Clinton and placed phone calls to his Chinese handler in the Lippo Group in Indonesia.

Stephens was a partner with James Riady of the Lippo Group in the Worthen bank in Little Rock. The bank was alleged to have been involved in laundering CIA drug money. The bank (and Stephens) were involved (along with the Rose Law firm and partners Hillary Clinton, Web Hubbell and Vince Foster) in the takeover of First American in Washington D.C. by BCCI. Robert Bartlett, the then Editorial page editor of the Wall Street Journal said he first starting keeping his eye on the Rose Law firm when he heard of its involvement with BCCI.

And there sat intern Mary Mahoney in the midst of all that activity. The Clinton’s had another reason to keep an eye on her. Mary was an open lesbian and aggressive supporter of gay rights. She had become something of a “den mother” for younger interns who claimed to have suffered sexual harassment at the hands of the president (not including Monica) She had been threatening to do something about it.

Mary also held a part time job as assistant cashier at the local Starbucks coffee shop. In July of 1997, she and two other employees were gunned down around closing time by what police claimed was a robbery although no money was taken. Mahoney was shot five times. One of the shots was to the back of her head gangland execution style.

In March of the following year, FBI agent Bradley Garrett arrested Carl Derek Cooper for the three murders. After 54 hours of questioning by Garrett and another agent, Cooper signed a confession that he immediately repudiated as soon as he got to court. Garrett is currently in charge of the Chandra Levy “missing persons” case and was the lead agent on the Vince Foster death determined to be a “suicide.”

Judge Joyce Hens Green set a trial date for April 10, 1999. This is the point at which the cast of characters becomes bizarre starting with Judge Green who was first appointed as a federal judge by President Jimmy Carter in 1979.

In the last year of President Reagan’s second term, Green was appointed to the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to serve a non-renewable seven-year term. That court deals exclusively with national security and with international terrorism, and involves approving applications for electronic surveillance. Judges on that court require the highest security clearance available. In 1990, then President George Herbert Walker Bush appointed Green presiding judge of that court and she handled all emergency matters during the remaining five years of her term.

Judge Green also presided over the BCCI trial that had resulted from indictments obtained by New York Assistant District Attorney Robert Morgenthau. Morgenthau’s investigation was stopped when the FBI stepped in under the direction of Robert Meuller (currently the new FBI Director) and no further investigation ensued. Judge Green approved plea bargains that resulted in BCCI forfeiting its assets in the United States. Two defendants had been indicted, Roger Altman and Clark Clifford an influential power broker in the Democrat party. The two men had accepted the two top spots in First American after the BCCI takeover but claimed they had no idea BCCI was involved in the nearly nine years they functioned in those capacities. Altman was acquitted and Clifford never stood trial because of ill health.

Back to the Cooper trial. Before the trial even started, a controversy arose when Janet Reno announced she was going to seek the death penalty for Cooper. D.C. officials were furious claiming Reno was overstepping her bounds. The district had never asked for the death penalty in any murder case.

Reno held a hearing on the matter. At that hearing, defense attorney William Martin (not connected with the Cooper case) urged Reno to ask for the death penalty. Yes, that’s the same Billy Martin who represented Monica Lewinski’s mother, Marcia Lewis, and currently represents Chandra Levy’s parents.

To complete the cast, Judge Green then appointed attorney Francis D. Carter to represent Cooper. Carter is the Frank Carter to whom Vernon Jordan took Monica Lewinski. Carter prepared the false affidavit for Monica’s signature, which put her at risk for perjury when she later testified in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. Monica escaped prosecution when she was granted immunity by independent counsel Ken Starr.

With Carter as his defense counsel, Cooper was convicted despite a weak circumstantial evidence case. There were, of course, no eyewitnesses and Cooper’s fingerprints were not found at the murder scene. During his 54 hours of interrogation, Cooper had consistently denied the crime and volunteered several times to take a lie detector test. Most of the testimony against him was by FBI agent Garrett based on Garrett’s representation of what Cooper had said during the interrogation. The questioning was not recorded or videotaped although another agent took notes.

One wonders at the array of a high-powered Washington judge with ties to the intelligence community and an attorney who barely escaped being disbarred (in another high profile case) in a case claimed to be a routine robbery murder case by a career criminal.”

Garrett’s name has surfaced again as one of the two questioners of Lee Malvo, the alleged teenage sniper. When Malvo was transferred from Maryland to Virginia, he underwent seven hours of interrogation by Garrett and Fairfax County detective June Boyle. Boyle had told Malvo he would get to see the attorney he had requested but first they wanted to ask a few questions about his background as “part of the booking process.” Then followed the seven-hour interrogation.

Garrett has filed “summaries” of Malvo’s answers (which were taped) purporting to confess to some of the shootings. However, it appears Malvo was responding to “hypotheticals “ posed as to what the snipers may have done.

Much of Garrett’s summary has been leaked to the press. Officials have been quoted as saying no harm has been done since the “confessions” will probably be suppressed by the court and “at least the public will know.”

Two more names recently in the news were involved in the investigation of the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole in Yemen.

From Bojinka – The Dog That Didn’t Bark” of June 18, 2002:

“Surely FBI terrorism expert John O’Neill would have known the details of Bojinka having investigated the 1993 WTC bombing and the plot to blow up 11 airliners. O’Neill’s departure from the FBI was started when he tangled with the U.S. Ambassador to Yemen over the investigation of the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole. She banned him from Yemen. O’Neill’s reputation was further stained when his briefcase containing classified documents went missing for several hours when he was called away to the telephone during a conference in Tampa, Florida. As a result of that unexplained incident, he was told he would not get a position in the National Security Agency (NSA) that he believed he had earned.

O’Neill became the Director of Public Safety at the WTC after he resigned and died mysteriously during the 9/11 attack. He had phoned his girlfriend after the first tower was hit to inform her he was safe.”

When O’Neill was bounced from the Cole investigation, the search for the culprits effectively ended. The report of the navy admiral who headed the DOD investigation of the bombing concentrated on recommendations for improvements in security. It did not assess any blame. O’Neill later said he was removed because he was getting too close to foreign dignitaries. He had already had a run in with FBI Director Freeh over the free ride Saudi Arabia was getting in investigation of the bombings of the U.S. embassies.

The U.S. Ambassador to Yemen who squelched the Cole investigation is Barbara Bodine. She was just recently appointed by President Bush as a key player in Iraq’s transitional government. She will effectively be the “Mayor of Baghdad” said one former high-ranking Senate official. She is to administer one of the three sectors in which Iraq will be divided. Hers is the central sector that includes Baghdad.

A Pentagon official who asked not to be identified, according to Washington reporter Jerry Sepe, said “Miss Bodine dismissed warnings of terrorist attacks in Yemen against U.S. ships and allowed the Cole to enter port at a reduced security level because she felt the value of showing a U.S. presence in Yemen outweighed the risks.”

Sege also reports, “FBI executives and agents familiar with the Cole probe said Miss Bodine, as ambassador in Yemen, prevented the bureau from advancing its investigation into the bombing at a time when agents were beginning to focus on the Saudi millionaire Osama bin Laden.”

The admiral, that didn’t want to know who bombed the Cole, and was at odds with O’Neill in the investigation, is Harold W. Gehman, Jr. He currently heads the investigation into the Columbia shuttle disaster. He is repeating his Cole “mandate” by only looking at improving methods and procedures and not trying to assess any blame.

We have previously reported on the makeup of the Commission appointed to investigate the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the earlier cover-ups in which many of that body have been involved.

It doesn’t seem to make any difference whether a Republican or Democrat administration is in office, many of the same “old reliables” are called back into service to “investigate” high profile incidents when the public doesn’t “need to know” all of the facts.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)



Permission is granted to reproduce this article in its entirety.
The author is a free lance writer based in Romulus, Michigan. He is a former newspaper editor and investigative reporter, a retired customs administrator and accountant, and a student of history and the U.S. Constitution.

If you would like to receive Medium Rare articles directly, please contact us at jimrarey@comcast.net. Although not necessary, we would appreciate an indication of the city and/or state or country (If outside the USA) in which you are located to give us an idea as to where our articles are being received.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
benn



Joined: 19 Sep 2002
Posts: 2136
Location: Sacramento, CA

PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting, skipper. It will probably take me a long time to begin to figure it all out.

>>It doesn’t seem to make any difference whether a Republican or Democrat administration is in office<<

That seems to be right. Government seems to take on a life of its own. I may sign up to receive some of those Medium Rare articles. There are so many writers writing about so many different things, and posting on the internet at different places, it is hard to find them all.

Someone, somewhere, can find out more about the Chandra Levy case.

benn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9274
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The new US Attorney in DC this year, Wainstein, was also the prosecutor for the Starbuck's case, so Wainstein and Garrett are paired again on Chandra's case.

I think Wainstein is the key. He would decide if there is to be a renewal of grand jury action, and the recent NE article mentioned a renewal of the grand jury. Whether NE reporters are smoking something illegal or Wainstein's office would respond to any queries, I don't know, but NE implies that once he was assigned as US Attorney in May that he wants to move on this case.

There has been some movement, reports of looking for someone Condit may have inadvertantly introduced to Chandra as the killer. The concept of Chandra running around with Condit to parties is total crap. So is Condit unwittingly introducing Chandra to a killer.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
laskipper



Joined: 17 Sep 2002
Posts: 1232
Location: Northern Ohio

PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
There has been some movement, reports of looking for someone Condit may have inadvertantly introduced to Chandra as the killer. The concept of Chandra running around with Condit to parties is total crap. So is Condit unwittingly introducing Chandra to a killer.

rd


Well I have to agree with the fact that Condit wouldn't likely be taking Chandra to the "parties" that he attended. The only exception that I can recall is the party for Bush. Did she attend that with Condit? I don't remember that detail.

They have to use some kind of cover statement when releasing news about the case. Stating that Condit unwittingly (or however they termed it) intoduced Chandra to the "Maryland Man" was just a CYA statement, IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9274
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, and I hope you're right about that. Condit gave Chandra some VIP tickets for a Bush inaugural function but Condit did not attend that function. Chandra was writing that she was looking forward to her man coming back when Congress resumed after that.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index -> Chandra Levy and missing women All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 12 of 14

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group