www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index www.justiceforchandra.com
Justice for Chandra Levy and missing women
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Another missing woman/girl-Joanna Rogers, 16, of Lubbock, TX
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 31, 32, 33 ... 40, 41, 42  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index -> Jennifer Kesse and similar disappearances
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nan



Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 207
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:04 pm    Post subject: good news article on search for Joanna Reply with quote

This is the best article in recent weeks on Joanna. From the Texas Tech newspaper, of course. Students, not professional journalists. Interesting that the DEA/ATF are involved. I am seeing nothing in the local media this morning, and last emailed Lubbock on Monday - it rained a bit there but have no word on if it has caused any more delays on the excavation. If not, they should be at target depth any time now, if not already.

(DEA=Drug Enforcement Agency, a national org. ATF= Bureau of Alcohol, Tobbaco, and Firearms, also a national org. DPS= Texas Department of Public Safety, like a state police force. FBI=Federal Bureau of Investigation (The Feds).


Search of landfill begins in hopes of finding missing teenager Rogers
Paul Roberts
Issue date: 8/28/06 Section: News



The Lubbock County Sheriff's Office began a search of a Lubbock landfill Saturday to search for the body of missing teenager Joanna Rogers. The Sheriff's Department received a $100,000 grant to fund the search of the Lubbock landfill for Joanna Rogers, who has been missing for more than two years.

Captain Don Carter of the sheriff's department said the department is prepared to begin the search after some delays because of rainy weather. Carter said Sheriff Gutierrez was able to secure a state funded grant of $100,000 while in Austin earlier this month. Carter said the amount was necessary because of the magnitude of the search. "We needed to obtain certain leases for machinery we don't have," Carter said. "Then, add fuel costs, which are a big chunk of money." He said the search will utilize several law enforcement agencies and large manpower putting in the extra hours. "Our people have been working 15 hours of overtime a week, even working on weekends," Carter said. "The FBI, DEA, ATF and DPS are all involved with this search."

Joanna Rogers has been missing since May 4, 2004. She was 16 years old at the time of her disappearance. Her parents last saw her after coming home from a day's work at Subway on 82nd Street and Akron Avenue. The next day, her parents entered her bedroom to find Joanna missing. She left no evidence of where she went. Her keys and purse were left in her room, which appeared untouched without a trace of forcible entry. Her purse, keys and cell phone were left in her room, Sheriff's Detectives said. Carter said they will be looking at a specific area of 100 by 150 feet, with a depth of 24 feet. He said the search is based on the time period of when Joanna Rogers' body would have been placed in the landfill.

He said the 24-foot-deep digging area has three layers, but the search will concentrate on the bottom layer. Carter said the search will be divided into two phases. The first phase deals with finding certain areas to concentrate the search. "We are going to first remove those top two layers so our equipment can reach the bottom layer," he said. The second phase involves manually searching through this bottom layer of debris. "We are going to use the machinery and spread the garbage over a flat surface, so the debris is only six inches deep," he said. "Two search teams of 15 members will be used to hunt through the debris." Carter said he believes the search will provide some answers to Joanna Roger's disappearance. "The landfill's records are pretty accurate," he said. "This has allowed us to pinpoint our areas of interest."


He said if the search does find a body, the Lubbock Medical Examiner will determine if the body is of Joanna Rogers. He said the Rogers' family is anxious for results of the search. "The family understands and accepts what needs to be done," Carter said. Kathy Rogers, Joanna's mother, said she and her family are deeply appreciative of the extra efforts of the sheriff's department. "We are not talking extra efforts, we are talking massive efforts," Kathy Rogers said. "We are very humbled of the risks they are taking. They are following each and every lead they receive. The Sheriff's department is optimistic in finding our daughter." Rogers said she hopes her daughter's body is not found in the landfill search, but if she is, it will bring some closure to the family. "We need to be patient and pray," Kathy Rogers said. Kathy Rogers said she is grateful to the Lubbock community for all its help over the last two years. She said she misses her daughter and cannot pick one thing she misses the most."Do I have to limit it to just one?" Kathy Rogers said. "We very much miss her at home."

The decision to search the landfill comes after Rosendo Rodriguez III confessed to abducting and killing Joanna Rogers and placing her body in the Lubbock landfill. Rodriguez has been in jail since September when he was arrested for the murder of a Lubbock woman. 25-year-old Rodriguez is accused of killing Summer Baldwin in September, then placing her remains in a suitcase and dumping it at a landfill north of Lubbock, according to police reports. Baldwin was pregnant at the time. Police were able to link Rodriguez to Baldwin's murder through the barcodes of the suitcase. The barcodes matched a purchase by Rodriguez at a local Wal-Mart store, along with a purchase of latex gloves.

In December, police named Rodriguez as a suspect in the disappearance of Joanna Rogers. The link between Rodriguez and Joanna Rogers went public during Rodriguez's bond reduction hearing in late December, according to police reports. During Rodriguez's bond reduction hearing, a Lubbock police officer was being interrogated on the stand and mentioned a link between Joanna Rogers and Rodriguez through each others' computers. Kathy Rogers said she has no comment on Rodriguez' confession, but can't help to ponder the what ifs of this two-year-long investigation. "The sequence of events boggles my mind. What if those people at the landfill had not opened the suitcase? What if Rodriguez had never been arrested?" Kathy Rogers said. "We would still be where we were two years ago."

[Had a nightmare last night - that they found several bodies in the landfill, and none were Joanna.]
_________________
Please remember Joanna, and all those who've gone missing. BringJoHome.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nan



Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 207
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rain is delaying the excavation. It's raining again there today. They were hoping to be at Phase Two (sifting the appropriate layer) by Tuesday, but it's going to have to be pushed back.
_________________
Please remember Joanna, and all those who've gone missing. BringJoHome.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9275
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is an excellent article, Nan. And great quotes from Joanna's mother. The work is hard and dangerous but with puncture resistant biohazard suits and a decontamination spraydown before taking them off should keep everyone safe.

This should be routine in a number of areas, from cleaning asbestos to superfund toxic sites to military bases to industrial sites.

And yes, now extracting landfills.

rd
_________________
ralph@ee.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nan



Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 207
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The landfill is basically a swamp right now, as they had something like 4 inches of rain since last Friday. More is forecast. They can't do anything out there until it stops raining long enough to dry out.
_________________
Please remember Joanna, and all those who've gone missing. BringJoHome.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
peripeteia



Joined: 22 Sep 2002
Posts: 1173
Location: Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nan what a mess the rain is creating for the search, as well as flouding in may areas of the South. What a task is set before these searchers, as well as other people doing similiar work. The potential health risks are mind boggling, as well as the rain is likely making insect control very difficult, and I don't know about pests in the air that bite in Texas, but it is a huge problem here, the mosquitoes, knats, midgets, bees, hornets and the like!!!!!

Hat's off to the searchers!!!!!
_________________
A vision sent me on the path of seeking justice for Chandra, nothing I've seen in print to date has diminished the vividness but only served to reaffirm the validity of this vision.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nan



Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 207
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Truly. They get mosquitos there after a rain....
_________________
Please remember Joanna, and all those who've gone missing. BringJoHome.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9275
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those biohazard suits will be doing double duty. As bad as the drought was, I know they needed this rain. Too bad they weren't able to move more aggressively in searching for Joanna during the many preceding dry months.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
peripeteia



Joined: 22 Sep 2002
Posts: 1173
Location: Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rd:

I suppose it is difficult to tell if RR is lying, my guess he'd do anything to stay alive, law enforcement was exercising caution in believing his testimony, and convincing others who hold the money strings that he is telling the truth might not have been an easy task.

I too imagine that it is more auspicious to begin a search in the dump in cooler weather. This would cut down on the methane gas production, also, the rain would cool down whatever is brewing in the pit, although moisture creates a cesspool for insects to feed off, and for bacteria and mold to grow.

It is still a wild card that Joanna is in the dump, although the police seem to be convinced that RR is telling the truth about Joanna being there.
The part that does not ring true is about placing Joanna in one trunk/suitcase, and her clothes in another. I can't see that Joanna likely had enough stuff with her to warrant needing another suitcase. Less of course whatever evidence was around he got rid of with the second suitcase, but for her clothes alone, can't really see this....

We know very little about this guy, other than he was involved in drugs, and he had an association with Summer, Joanna's email to RR was found on her computer. Wonder if he ever hung out around Joanna's work? I was convinced there would be others that she knew who might have seen this guy around Joanna before she disappeared? We do not know how RR met Summer? My point is how did he come to prey on these women?
What was his modus operandi?

Might RR be responsible for other missing and murdered women in the area, he leaves no witnesses to tell his game, to reveal his lure? We do not know if he premediated these murders, we know he certainly went to great trouble to dispose of Summer, latex gloves, trunk etc. RR is involved in the Methamphedimine world, did he kill these two women in a drug crazed state or did he kill them to silience them about his sexual perversions or because they might tell about his drugs?

What lessons can society gain from the loss of these two very young women, what to we need to tell our Youth to avoid becoming victims, therefore it becomes important to know exactly what RR did to these women, at least how he met them, how did he lure these women into his confidence?

Did RR murder Summer and Joanna because he was having paranoid attacks because of the drug?

These questions are important, so that the proper education and messages might reach our Youth how to avoid the snarls and entrapment and lure of drugs, internet chat rooms, and internet dating?

Methamphedimine and crack cocaine is destroying the minds of millions and the government seems to be doing very little to curb the production, distribution and consumption of drugs in America, yet this same government spends millions to destroy the opium crops in the East? To ride the East of their problem?

Little is also being done to get treatment for drug addicts, and to teach the Youth not to go there! Most youth buy their drugs at school!

Child explotation and child pornography is being produced, and distributed over the internet, and pedophiles and sex offenders are rampid and panedemic, inside and outside our prisons.

Children are being kidnapped, sexually assaulted and murdered at a rate unknown in modern times, as well as young men and women. One wonders why more monies is not funnelled into law enforcement to deal with the problem of drugs and sexual deviance, and to teach our Youth to protect themselves against predators.

Perhaps Joanna's law could be one that states that Youth will be educated in the evils of the internet, sexual deviants and drug avoidance!
_________________
A vision sent me on the path of seeking justice for Chandra, nothing I've seen in print to date has diminished the vividness but only served to reaffirm the validity of this vision.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TJ



Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 75
Location: New Mexico

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

peripeteia wrote:


Methamphedimine and crack cocaine is destroying the minds of millions and the government seems to be doing very little to curb the production, distribution and consumption of drugs in America, yet this same government spends millions to destroy the opium crops in the East? To ride the East of their problem?


The Taliban had put a real dent in the opium trade, until the US invaded. Since that time, Afghanistan now supplies 93% of the worlds opium. You can now buy heroin cheaper and purer than you could 30 years ago.

We spent nearly a billion dollars trying to eradicate coca plants in Columbia. We managed to eradicate rain forest, contaminate the water supply and food crops of indigenous peoples, and the growers moved to Peru. We tried the same in Peru, they moved to Ecuador. The price and quality of cocaine was not affected.

In the US last year, the DEA spent millions of dollars and thousands of man-hours finding and destroying marijuana plants. According to official DEA figures, police seized an estimated 223 million marijuana plants last year. But 219 million of them, or 98%, were ditchweed, the remnants of legal hemp crops from the '40's. A joint the size of a telephone pole would give you a headache, but not get you high.

If you read US newspapers, listen to our politicians or law enforcement personnel when asking for more funds to fight the War on Drugs or build prisons, methamphetamine use is epidemic, yet the US Dept. of Health figures show that is is 17th on the list of drugs causing harm, and that use has dropped for the last 5 years. This is not because of law enforcement efforts, but because of education.

You want to win the War on Drugs? Then legalize them. Take the profits away from the cartels, the terrorists, the street gangs and pushers. Eliminate the impurities from backyard chemists that cause more problems than the drugs themselves, and let legitimate pharmaceutical companies provide quality controlled, regulated (and taxed) products. Take the billions of dollars presently wasted on interdiction and enforcement and channel it instead into education and treatment, and more importantly, on violent crime - something with at least a chance of success.

You will never eliminate drug use. It is an intrinsic part of human nature to change their consciousness in one way or another. Pottery dated to 16,000 years ago showed use of pot plants. Mankind has always experimented with plants, fermenting, smoking, sniffing or eating whatever would work. For the vast majority, it wasn't a problem. For the estimated 10 to 15 percent of addictive personalities, it is. The problem is, if you remove the problem users drug of choice, they will find something to substitute for it.

Use that money to educate people. Most will experiment, and grow out of it. Use some to treat the minority who do have addiction problems. Eliminate the black market, and the overdoses and deaths due to contaminants will be negligible, and far fewer will be caught in the crossfire, fewer hit by stray bullets, fewer attracted to the lure of easy money, and a major source of funds for terrorists and criminals would disappear.

We could even start building more schools that we do prisons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9275
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To add to that, for someone to suggest that the murderer was on drugs essentially excuses the person, as if to say the person isn't really a murderer, he was on drugs, and if he wasn't on drugs he'd be a good guy just like the rest of us.

On top of that, there is no indication that Rodriguez was drugged up when he murdered Summer Baldwin. He was in Wal-Mart shopping at 3 in the morning for a suitcase and latex gloves, a few hours after he picked her up on a streetcorner.

I don't know what kind of "drugged" behavior one wants to attribute to that, but he was coherent enough to do it, and that's all that counts for me.

No, banning drugs creates crime all right, but because they are now worth large sums of money instead of the pennies it took to make them, and the crime is the crime of fighting over the illicit black market trade.

Using drugs does not create murderers out of innocent, otherwise respectable, decent human beings. Being involved with selling illegal drugs often does.

Another point I missed somewhere along the line was that of Rodriguez claiming that Joanna was in one suitcase and her clothes in another. If that's posted here I completely forgot it.

With Rodriguez on Joanna's PC messenger buddy list, in my opinion he would have to be disproved as the person behind Joanna's disappearance, not the other way around. Only if there were proof he was in another city at that time would I move to Plan B.

I know some people don't like that way of thinking, what with presumption of innocence and all that, but the odds that a Lubbock man who tried to make a local woman disappear in a landfill was just a friendly chatter to another local young woman who disappeared is just a little too high for my taste.

Again, I would make any deal with this creep to spare his life contingent upon confirmation of the details he gave. He'd better hope they find Joanna, if he doesn't want to fry.

rd
_________________
ralph@ee.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nan



Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 207
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, i had seen the two-suitcase quote in the press somewhere. but you have to be REALLY careful listening to the press - they've gotten so many things wrong so often that all they can really do is be a barometer for the case - if you hear them saying something after a period of silence, you know something is going on. what it is that is going on is an entirely 'nuther matter.

they are, if the rain held off this weekend, supposed to be down to the "scoop and sift" layer of the landfill maybe tomorrow. kathy rogers sent a note on friday indicating she thought it would be two or three more days. (see bringjohome.info for complete info).

rosendo has had trouble before. he was thrown out of his fraternity at tech - and you have to be a real miscreant before you can get yourself thrown out of a fraternity and then have all the fraternity people go completely silent as to why. my guess is that he has an inflated opion of his worth in the world, and discounts the worth of women entirely. and that he has a hair-trigger temper. either that, or he's been paid to shut people up. my guess is the former, but the latter is not out of the question.
_________________
Please remember Joanna, and all those who've gone missing. BringJoHome.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
peripeteia



Joined: 22 Sep 2002
Posts: 1173
Location: Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree TJ, that methamphedimine has to be moved way up on the dangerous drug list, somewhere akin to the top.. as well as crack cocaine, and estacsy.

I think taking Meth does make monsters out of human beings, and crack cocaine as well. Whatever the high is, the damage in human suffering outweights any benefit methamphedimine might have, it is posion, with a kick to it. I've never heard of anyone being high on pot and committing crime, there is far less crime on pot than alcohol. So much money and effort is being wasted destroying the wrong type of drugs, and little is done to curb the consumption of alcohol and other lethal and mind altering drugs.

meth, crack cocaine, estacsy and should be outlawed, unfit for human consumption... There is the whole problem of lack of resources for addictions, in a country that is being crippled by the problem of illicit harmful drugs, and alcoholism and the misuse of precription addictive drugs, swift and immediate action is needed by the government to deal with the problem of drugs, as little is being done presently. One would hope that before marching off on a crusade to stamp out drugs, models would be adopted from other countries dealing more effectively with similar problems, treatments and penalities for drug users and sellers has not kept pace with the ever growing problems associated with crime and drugs, as well as the physical and mental damage, and loss of life and occupation associated with illicit drug consumption, and human suffering and in monetary terms, this likely excessed the Gross National Product.

In one day, making drugs legal, but the comsumption illegal, and mandatory treatment would certainly make the streets more safer, and treatment centers more plentyful. In one day all the drug cartels would be eliminated much of the crime associated with drugs would end.

Addiction is a problem that belongs in the field of medicine, especially with the spread of AIDS, that sharing needles is an absolute no, and the government should have programmes in every state for clean needles, and in this way too there would be opportunity for addiction counselling, as well as Blood Borne Diseases conselling.

Anything would be better than the nightmare of the drug problem that it is presently and the disgrace of the justice system using as a defense for the guilty addiction problems, or sleep walking or whatever other ridulcous defenses some felons come up with about how this and that was not there fault, it just doesn't fly. Every single person in the world should know not to take Meth Amphedimine, and Crack Cocaine....or estascy and other mild altering drugs, these drugs are absolutely dangerous.

The problem of eliminating Heroin is that it is needed for pain control, real or imagined. It is a drug necessary to mankind, how one curbs this addiction, it is the most humane the British Model of dealing with Heroin and other narcotic treatments and penalities for possession etc.

Something has to give!
_________________
A vision sent me on the path of seeking justice for Chandra, nothing I've seen in print to date has diminished the vividness but only served to reaffirm the validity of this vision.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TJ



Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 75
Location: New Mexico

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

peripeteia wrote:
I agree TJ, that methamphedimine has to be moved way up on the dangerous drug list, somewhere akin to the top.. as well as crack cocaine, and estacsy.


Kate, I think you misunderstood me. The reason that meth is so far down the list, is that it is not as problematic as politicians, preachers, the media, and those who run and build prisons make it out to be.

peripeteia wrote:
I think taking Meth does make monsters out of human beings, and crack cocaine as well.


I think taking meth, like excessive use of alcohol, just removes inhibitions and self-control, and lets out those facets of one's personality that are usually suppressed. It opens the door to one's inner-Monster, so to speak. Without the drug or alcohol, it is likely that something else would trigger that lack of control at some point. Drugs and alcohol just facilitate it. and should never be used as an excuse or rationalisation for behaviour.

peripeteia wrote:
meth, crack cocaine, estacsy and should be outlawed, unfit for human consumption...


They are outlawed, and have been for quite some time, and look where that has gotten us. By prohibiting them, we have made the problems worse. Look at cocaine - at one time, you could buy it without prescription at any pharmacy in powder form (clean, no adulterants), or buy a tonic with a mild coca solution (the original Coca Cola) which was far more popular and preferred by the majority of users. (Peruvians used the milder forms for thousands of years with no ill affects.) By making it illegal, the suppliers went to the powder form, more concentrated and easier to smuggle and/or hide, also more susceptible to adulteration, and dangerous to the user. This is exactly what happened during Alcohol Prohibiton - people went from drinking Budweiser or Johnny Walker to drinking bathtub gin that could blind or kill them. The same is true of opiates. After the Civil War until the prohibition of opiates in 1907, there was a higher rate of use than there has been since, but it was for the most part not problematic. Almost every housewife had a bottle of paregoric or laudunum in her medicine cabinet, or a tonic sold by traveling salesmen containing alcohol and opiate solutions which they used because nice women were not allowed in bars. It was a problem for about 10 to 15 percent of the users, for most it was a minor part of their lives.

peripeteia wrote:
In one day, making drugs legal, but the comsumption illegal, and mandatory treatment would certainly make the streets more safer, and treatment centers more plentyful. In one day all the drug cartels would be eliminated much of the crime associated with drugs would end.


Basic economics - as long as there is a demand, there will be a supplier. The dealers don't drive the market, the consumers do. You cannot legalize a substance and criminalize its use.

peripeteia wrote:
Addiction is a problem that belongs in the field of medicine, especially with the spread of AIDS, that sharing needles is an absolute no, and the government should have programmes in every state for clean needles, and in this way too there would be opportunity for addiction counselling, as well as Blood Borne Diseases conselling.


You are absolutely correct. What most people don't realize is that out of all recreational drug users, only 10 to 15 percent have problems with it, outside of legal problems. Provide safer alternatives, more importantly accurate education about drug use and drug dangers, and quit wasting time and resources on the 85 percent who are not problematic. Spend the resources on the addicts and problem users, who in most cases are self-medicating to treat undiagnosed or ignored psychological problems.

Two comments about addiction, which is not well understood. Many think that some drugs are addictive, and that that is all they need to know. Consider this: The two era's in the US with the highest rates of opiate addiction were the late 19th century, and during the Viet Nam War. When the Pure Food & Drug Act was passed in 1907, mandating labeling the ingredients on all foods and medicines, many of the previously mentioned housewifes realized what was in their tonics, and quit using them on their own. During Viet Nam, a huge number of veterans got addicted to heroin. We learned that after returning home, getting away from traumatic events and involvement in affairs many felt they should not be involved in, the majority kicked the habit pretty quickly, often on their own. The physical side of addiction is the easiest part to treat - it is the pschological factors that are really problematic, and what usually lead to the addiction moreso than the drug itself.


Kate, please don't think I am justifying drug use, for that is not my intent. After years of studying this issue, I realize that it isn't going to go away. People always have, and always will use drugs (I don't distinguish between drugs and alcohol, as the only difference is in legality.) We need to quit treating it as a legal or moral issue, understanding that people have different views of what is moral, and that by making them illegal we have set a system that encourages a very dangerous black market that makes the problem worse, not better. Don't depend on the government to do it for you, as they are the ones who got us into this mess, and in a century of prohibition have only made it worse.


Last edited by TJ on Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:30 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TJ



Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 75
Location: New Mexico

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just in case anyone thinks the previous comments are off-topic, consider this: RR is reputed to be a meth user. Several of the rumours concerning the disappearance of Jennifer Wilkerson imply that she may have seen or learned something done by a drug gang and was either eliminated or had to disappear. How many other missing people have or could possibly have some type of connection to the drug world, incidental or not? It is a problem that has infested every strata of society, and is not being dealt with in a rational or effective manner.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nan



Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 207
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meth is a hideous problem, it's everywhere. Even the most rural communities are encountering it. So sad, so sad.

They have reached searching depth. It's rained a lot, lately. As the landfill dries out a bit, they will begin to spread debris over a secure area and go over it with rakes, shovels, hoes, by hand, looking....
_________________
Please remember Joanna, and all those who've gone missing. BringJoHome.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index -> Jennifer Kesse and similar disappearances All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 31, 32, 33 ... 40, 41, 42  Next
Page 32 of 42

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group