www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index www.justiceforchandra.com
Justice for Chandra Levy and missing women
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Guandique -- Charges dropped
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index -> Chandra Levy and missing women
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sigsky



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 209
Location: South Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:57 pm    Post subject: No Retrial, Guandique to be set free (sort of) Reply with quote

It appears Ingmar Guandique's part in the Chandra Levy saga is over. The prosecutor admits they have insufficient evidence to uphold the conviction.

Should be interesting to see what happens next. Will the case be re-opened?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rainbow



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 866
Location: THE LEFT COAST

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:00 pm    Post subject: Independence Day! Reply with quote

Wow, Sigsky! This is the day I have been waiting for for so many years!!!
Congratulations, Ingmar and defense team, and congratulations to all of the participants in this forum, who have supported the quest for truth in this case!!!

The Washington Post
by Keith L. Alexander
washingtonpost.com
July 28, 2016

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/charges-dropped-against-man-accused-of-killing-washington-intern-chandra-levy/2016/07/28/36f36630-54ee-11e6-bbf5-957ad17b4385_story.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rainbow



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 866
Location: THE LEFT COAST

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:19 pm    Post subject: What New Information Was Uncovered? Reply with quote

Hi, everybody! Does anybody know what new information came to light last week?

Charges Dropped Against Ingmar Guandique in Chandra Levy Case
www.nbcwashington.com
by NBC4 Washington
July 28, 2016

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Ingmar-Guandique-Will-Not-Be-Retried-in-Death-of-Chandra-Levy-Will-Be-Released-388568032.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rainbow



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 866
Location: THE LEFT COAST

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:24 pm    Post subject: News from Modesto Reply with quote

Modesto Bee
Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Ingmar Guandique in Chandra Levy Case
by Michael Doyle
July 28, 2016

http://www.modbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article92378417.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gozgals



Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 2892
Location: A Place Called Vertigo

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just read this news all...................Was going to post but found it here.

OMG, just wonderful news. We have been waiting... yes.

goz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admin



Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 126

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reposting for Rainbow

Did the FBI's re-interviews of Mr. C's former girlfriends yield new evidence that completely excluded Guandique as the perpetrator?


New Developments in Chandra Levy Murder Case
by Reena Ninan and Paula Reid
cbsnews.com
July 28, 2016

http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/new-developments-in-chandra-levy-murder-case/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admin



Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 126

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reposting for Rainbow

Or, are the new developments related to evidence that was never investigated or shared with the defense and not made available at Guandique's trial, like the 9-11 call that was made in response to the scream that was heard in Chandra Levy's building the night before the day Chandra officially went missing and which was never provided to the defense for use in Guandique's trial?

Washington Times
Prosecutors Drop Murder Charges Against Chandra Levy's Accused Killer
by Andrea Noble
July 28, 2016

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/28/chandra-levy-accused-killer-wont-be-retried/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admin



Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 126

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reposting for Rainbow

Just enter Ingmar Guandique's name in the spaces, then select "case details" and you can view what was discussed in the hearing(s) leading up to the case's dismissal.

DC Courts
dccourts.gov

https://www.dccourts.gov/cco/maincase.jsf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9273
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Public Defender shook them all up saying he would be going after Condit, and these people have never wanted to answer questions about Chandra before she disappeared. Did they wait for Congress to leave town before dropping charges? I think that's what they were waiting for.

New info investigated last week? Quite frankly, I don't believe them. Now if it comes to light there really was some new info, I will be glad to be wrong.

I think they didn't even want to think about having to answer questions we've been posing here for 15 years.

I think we have to keep asking and poking what all of a sudden changed everything. Chandra faced same question when she was told to pack up at Bureau of Prisons.

rd

click to read the online true crime mystery novel Murder on a Horse Trail: The Disappearance of Chandra Levy

www.justiceforchandra.com home page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9273
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speaking of which, I was over on Washington Post reading the news and I saw in comments:

Why would anyone intern with the Bureau of Prisons? An ambition to be a prison warden?

paid internship job in PR office. Pretty high profile. Was said to have been acquired with a phone call from California. That and the way she was asked to leave a few days before she disappeared should raise lots of questions. Nobody's asking, and nobody is answering.

"Justice" in DC doesn't want to go there.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9273
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Condit supposedly had an alibi. But if they dont know when she died, what good is the alibi

Condit has no alibi or anything approximating one. He has no alibi from 12:50 to 6:30. Google Chaper Alibi in Murder on a Horse Trail.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9273
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding Condit: A few more words: Investigated and dismissed as the person who murdered this woman.

actually you'll find he didn't cooperate so wasn't investigated evn though DC Police tried their hardest to clear him. He has no alibi from 12:50 to 6:30 and there is literally nothing that clears him and everything that involves him.

rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9273
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was going to post this same thought tonight when I got home from work but Trochilus has said it better in Washington Post comments. I am going to quote here:

Trochilus
11:43 AM EST
The overall story seems questionable. An actress, who moved into a hotel in Washington, D.C. (Babs Proller), somehow befriends a male neighbor living in the building, who had reportedly helped her with her dog as she was moving in to those new digs. Fine so far.

But then the story begins to go off the rails. Somehow, she "quickly learns" he is a five-time convicted felon and gang-banger who had spent years in prison. But that does not scare her off. Instead, she seemingly nurtures their "budding" relationship, and proceeds to spend hours engaging in private conversations with him. At some point, she even begins regularly recording him privately -- i.e., unbeknownst to him. He eventually reveals to her that he was a 'jail-house snitch' who had cooked up a story, and had testified accordingly, giving false evidence in a murder trial that helped convict a fellow prisoner (at some prison in Kentucky) of the commission of a famous murder, one which took place way back in May of 2001.

But Babs doesn't go directly to the authorities. Oh, no! Instead, she goes to the young murdered girl's mother (Sandra Levy) and tells her, apparently relying on Levy to go to the authorities! Bear in mind that Chandra Levy's mother wants closure in this case -- one would think that she hardly would be motivated to go to the authorities and tell them that the man who was about to be retried for her daughter's murder, was likely innocent (of that crime), and that she now believes there is good testimonial proof available showing that their prime evidence in their case against him is false, and could blow up in their faces!

Why would Proller go to Chandra Levy's mother with this information, and rely on her to go to the authorities? This is explosive information which could potentially put Proller in very serious danger with her "new best friend " -- a five-times convicted felon who is now at serious risk for being slapped with a new indictment for perjury!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rd



Joined: 13 Sep 2002
Posts: 9273
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would add, how did a feared (San Francisco) Bay area heavily tattooed gangleader as the Washington justice system like to hyperventilate end up in a Washington hotel helping an actress carry her dog or something upstairs?

Well, he'd be being put up by DC Justice system for his scheduled upcoming re-testimony about the "cellmate confession" from Guandique, wouldn't he?
And neither the DC Justice system nor Morales wanted to go through that act again.

So we have a "confession" from Morales secretly tape recorded about lying about another "confession" and whew, just in time for Congress to leave town Susan Levy is notified by a House of Cards actress that Morales was lying when he said Guandique confessed to him about Chandra.

And so Susan notified the prosecutors and oops, we have to cancel the trial. We can't prove that Guandique killed Chandra. We don't even have the lying cellmate anymore which is the only thing that we rigged up for this kangaroo court conviction.

I know Susan got played, there's a reasonable chance the House of Cards actress got played, and Morales and his conniving DC prosecutor friends did the playing.

Now watch them close the books on Chandra's murder because they're out of lies.

rd

Why prosecutors dropped charges against the man accused of killing Washington intern Chandra Levy
Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/charges-dropped-against-man-accused-of-killing-washington-intern-chandra-levy/2016/07/28/36f36630-54ee-11e6-bbf5-957ad17b4385_story.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rainbow



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 866
Location: THE LEFT COAST

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:10 pm    Post subject: What in the World? Reply with quote

This is unbelievable! You can't make this stuff up!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.justiceforchandra.com Forum Index -> Chandra Levy and missing women All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group