View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
benn
Joined: 19 Sep 2002 Posts: 2136 Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:37 am Post subject: Greta takes email about Condit v. Dunne. |
|
|
Greta takes email about the Condit Dunne lawsuit. Well, I guess she does if one of her shows covers that territory.
>>E-mail No. 3 — Former Congressman Gary Condit is suing writer Dominick Dunne for comments Dunne made that Condit claims were libelous. A jury will decide this at some point.
Gary Condit is delusional if he thought he ever had a chance of reelection. I never heard anything Dominick Dunne said. I would have never voted for him after the Connie Chung show. Gary Condit needs to accept responsibility for his own actions. He
only has himself to blame.
E-mail No. 4
Greta,
I thought Gary Condit's lawyer was kind of rude to you in a way to avoid answering certain questions. Gary Condit jeopardized the Chandra Levy case by not answering and coming forward with information about his involvement with Chandra Levy — whether he is guilty of something or not he is definitely guilty of hindering and not being forward about his relationship with Levy. I really feel for Mr. and Mrs. Levy — I hope they get some closure to this case. I think it is great you bring up unsolved and cold cases. You should put more of these cold cases in your show. It would be an interesting subject. I love the show!
Jeff Thompson
VA
ANSWER: I don't think his lawyer was trying to be rude to me — just forceful in his opinion and aggressive in the representation of his client.<<<
What is going on with Condit v. Dunne this week? Or went on?" When do they depose again?
benn |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rd
Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 9273 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I saw "delayed till next month in March" I think in the story, not sure when. We'll see what Condit does when it's time to answer questions in front of a magistrate overseeing the deposition.
Not that Condit's answers he's like he's given so far matter to anything more than future perjury consideration.
rd |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|